Pediatric Orthopaedics

Timing of Pavlik Harness Initiation: Can We Wait? Background: Developmental dysplasia of the hip is effectively treated with a Pavlik harness (PH) within the first 6 months of life. Over 80% of unstable hips in the newborn period will naturally stabilize by 2 months of age. If there is no difference in the effectiveness of initiating PH treatment at 1 week compared with 4 weeks of age, waiting may allow the hips to naturally stabilize and avoid treatment. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether the timing of PH implementation influences its effectiveness in the treatment of developmental dysplasia of the hip. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted between 2004 and 2010. Patients were included if PH therapy was prescribed for hip instability or dislocation at or before 6 months of age. PH failure was defined as requiring any operative procedure for definitive management. Groups were divided based on the age at which the PH was initiated—group1=<30 days, group 2=30 to 60 days, group 3=>60 days. Results: A total of 176 children were included with 38 (21.6%) failing PH treatment. The mean age at PH initiation was 1.3 months (SD=1.3) in the successfully treated children and 1.4 months (SD=1.2) in the failures (P=0.77). There was no difference in the failure rates by age with group 1=19.1% (18/94), group 2=22.5% (9/40), and group 3=26.2% (11/42) (P=0.87). There was no statistical difference with respect to sex or breech positioning in the success or failure groups; however, there was a higher percentage of bilateral involvement in the failure group (P=0.04). Conclusions: Patients who had PH initiation before 30 days of age were no more or less likely to fail than when PH was initiated after 30 days of age. Parents can be counseled that waiting until after 30 days of age is appropriate before PH implementation. By avoiding swaddling during this period, the hips may stabilize without treatment and allow for more parental-infant bonding before implementation of PH. Level of Evidence: Level III—therapeutic, case control study.

Safe Transportation in-Spica Following Surgical Treatment of Infantile DDH: Solutions and Threats Background: Government regulations mandate appropriate vehicular restraints for children under 4 years of age. Patients treated for infantile developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) with spica casts often require special accommodations. Previous work suggests that car seat loaner programs may help achieve these goals while avoiding the need for costly ambulance transportation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our center's experience with postdischarge transportation in a large population of DDH infants and identify future threats to our program. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of patients 4 years or younger of age who underwent closed or open reduction for DDH at our center between 2011 and 2018. Only the initial surgery of staged procedures was included. Patient demographic factors were recorded, as were procedure type, final restraint used for postdischarge transportation, and any potential discharge delays secondary to transportation issues. Costs were compared amongst transportation options. Results: Our cohort consisted of 130 patients (mean age, 1.4±0.9 y; 98 females) treated for DDH. In total 41 children (31.5%) underwent closed reduction procedures, whereas 89 patients (68.5%) underwent open reductions. After reduction, 62 (47.7%) received 2-legged spica casts and 68 (52.3%) received 1.5-legged casts. The most common restraint was a hospital-loaned Hippo car seat (73, 55.8%) followed by family-owned car seats (27, 20.8%). Eight patients (6.2%) experienced delays in discharge while waiting for adequate restraints, 6 patients (4.6%) were transported by ambulance, and 4 patients (3.1%) left against medical advice with inadequate restraints. Conclusions: Following surgical treatment of DDH, over 50% of patients with a spica cast were discharged using our center's car seat loaner program. However, availability and cost can present barriers for patients, with 4.6% of patients still being transported home by ambulance and 3.1% with inadequate restraints against medical advice. Costs of car seats are significant both for patients' families intending to purchase them, as well as for hospitals maintaining loaner programs and replacing used/lost seats. Moving forward, the recent cessation of production of the most common "spica car seat" threatens the longevity of existing loaner programs and calls renewed attention to the issue of safe transportation in-spica from providers and car-seat manufacturers alike. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between a Triplane Proximal Femoral Osteotomy and the Modified Dunn Procedure for Stable, Moderate to Severe Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Background: Recent studies have demonstrated the intra-articular cartilage and labral damage that can occur from the proximal femoral cam-like deformity of a moderate to severe slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). The approach to treating this deformity in a symptomatic Loder stable hip is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare radiographic outcomes, complication rates, and revision rates between Imhauser type triplane proximal femoral osteotomy (TPFO) and the modified Dunn procedure (MDP). Methods: Twenty-six subjects with minimum 1-year follow-up were included (12 treated with a TPFO, and 14 treated with the MDP). A chart review was performed to capture data related to complications, revision procedures, surgical time, and body mass index. Radiographs were measured preoperatively and at final follow-up to evaluate epiphyseal-slip angle, neck-shaft angle, articular surface to trochanter distance, and medial proximal femoral angle. Results: Surgical time was shorter for the TPFO group (150.0±57.4 min) compared with the MDP group (203.8±30 min) (P=0.005). All preoperative and postoperative radiographic measures were similar between the 2 groups except postoperative neck-shaft angle, which was significantly less in the TPFO group (129.7±8.6 vs. 140.9±9.4 degrees) (P=0.005). There were no cases of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) in the TPFO group. The modified Dunn group had a 29% AVN rate (P=0.1). The overall complication rate was similar between the TPFO (33%) and modified Dunn (36%) groups (P=1.0) and the reoperation rate was slightly greater in the TPFO group (33%) as compared with the modified Dunn group (21%) (P=0.67). Conclusions: The complex 3-dimensional proximal femoral deformity of a moderate to severe SCFE can be difficult to treat with relatively high complication/reoperation rates observed in both TPFO and MDP groups. All 4 instances of AVN in this study of stable slips, however, were in the MDP group. As this can be a devastating complication leading to early total hip arthroplasty, we advise against the MDP in stable SCFE patients. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective comparative study.

Wash, Rinse, Repeat: Which Patients Undergo Serial Joint Irrigation in Pediatric Septic Hip Arthritis? Background: The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors associated with repeat surgical irrigation in pediatric septic hip arthritis. Methods: A single center retrospective case-control study was performed. Patients who underwent ≥2 washouts (cases) were compared with those who had only 1 washout (controls). Demographic, clinical, laboratory, microbial, and magnetic resonance imaging data were compared between cases and controls and a prediction model was developed using logistic regression. A risk score was then constructed by counting the number of risk factors from the model that were present in each patient. Results: We identified 26 patients between 1994 and 2015 who underwent ≥2 washouts for septic hip arthritis, and 63 control patients who had only a single washout. Twenty-two patients had 2 washouts, 3 had 4 washouts, 1 had 5 washouts. Median number of days between first and second washout was 5 (interquartile range, 4 to 8). The most common reason for repeat washout was persistent fever (N=21), followed by persistently elevated laboratory values (N=13), abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings (N=12), and continued pain (N=12). Repeat washout cases demonstrated higher temperature preoperatively (P<0.001), had more frequent initial misdiagnosis (P=0.002), and had a longer time from symptom onset to surgery (P=0.02). Laboratory values in these cases showed higher C-reactive protein (P=0.003), and more frequent left shift (P=0.03) at presentation, with a greater proportion of positive cultures (P<0.001). Postoperatively, repeat washout cases had higher temperatures (P<0.001), more frequent wound drainage (P=0.02), and complications (P=0.001). A risk score for predicting the likelihood of undergoing repeat washout was constructed by counting the number of the following factors present: presence of left shift in CBC, positive blood or synovial fluid cultures, and postoperative temperature over 39°C. Seventy percent of cases had ≥2 of these risk factors and 80% of controls had ≤1 risk factor. Conclusions: Cases of pediatric septic arthritis which undergo repeat washout are associated with left shift, high postoperative temperatures, and positive cultures. They have more frequent misdiagnosis leading to delayed treatment and subsequent medical complications. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Idiopathic Genu Valgum and Its Association With Obesity in Children and Adolescents Background: Obesity as a cause of lower extremity deformity in children has been well established. This deformity is most often seen as tibia vara, however, at our institution we have observed more obese children and adolescents over age 7 years with excessive or progressive idiopathic genu valgum. Our hypothesis is that children with idiopathic genu valgum have high rates of obesity which impact the severity of their disease. Methods: Retrospective review of existing data was performed on 66 consecutive children/112 limbs over age 7 years with idiopathic genu valgum, seen from 2010 to 2013. Children with known metabolic or skeletal disease were excluded. Genu valgum was defined as mechanical axis in zone II or III and mechanical tibiofemoral angle ≥4 degrees on standing anteroposterior radiograph of the lower extremities. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated and classified by Center for Disease Control percentiles. Skeletal maturation was rated by closure of pelvic and peri-genu physes. Severity of genu valgum was also assessed by femoral and tibial mechanical axes and the mechanical axis deviation. Results: Mean patient age was 12.2±2.2 years. 47% of patients had BMI≥30 and 71% were categorized as obese (>95th percentile). No sex differences were identified. Skeletal maturation explained 25% of the variance in the mechanical axis deviation and 22% of the mechanical tibiofemoral angle. BMI predicted 9.8% of the tibial valgus. Because of its skewed distribution, BMI percentile was a less useful parameter for assessment. Conclusions: The 71% obesity rate found in our children with idiopathic genu valgum is significantly higher than the normal population. Higher BMI is associated with more tibial valgum but skeletal maturation was the main predictor of overall valgus severity. This suggests that obesity may play a role in the etiology of idiopathic genu valgum which progresses with skeletal maturation, thereby increasing the risk of osteoarthritis in adulthood. Level of Evidence: Level III.

Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis in the Skeletally Immature: A Combined Technique Background: Young athletes with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption and limb malalignment pose a treatment dilemma. Little has been published regarding limb malalignment in this population. Our aim is to review the results of combined treatment of an ACL deficient knee and genu valgum in skeletally immature patients. Methods: A retrospective review of skeletally immature patients who underwent transphyseal ACL reconstruction and concomitant hemiepiphysiodesis between 2004 and 2015 by 1 surgeon at a single institution was performed. Included patients had at least a year of growth remaining and were followed to skeletal maturity. Patients with a diagnosis of a connective tissue disorder were excluded. Knee stability, rate of retear, the rate of mechanical axis correction, and time to full correction were determined. Results: Ninety skeletally immature patients underwent transphyseal ACL reconstruction, 8 of which met inclusion criteria. Mean time to correction of the valgus deformity was 13 months (0.4 degree/mo). No patient required additional surgeries for malalignment. All patients had improvement in knee stability. One patient had a retear of their ACL reconstruction, for a failure rate of 13%. Preoperative mechanical lateral distal femoral angle and mechanical axis deviation corrected to near-neutral alignment for all treated limbs and were significantly different (P=0.001) than those measured preoperatively. Conclusions: Promising results were seen for simultaneous correction of genu valgum and transphyseal ACL reconstruction. Treatment of both pathologies in a concomitant surgery can be considered in the appropriate population, with expected results comparable to each procedure in isolation. Level of Evidence: Level IV—case series.

Rebound Deformity After Growth Modulation in Patients With Coronal Plane Angular Deformities About the Knee: Who Gets It and How Much? Background: With observed success and increased popularity of growth modulation techniques, there has been a trend toward use in progressively younger patients. Younger age at growth modulation increases the likelihood of complete deformity correction and need for implant removal before skeletal maturity introducing the risk of rebound deformity. The purpose of this study was to quantify magnitude and identify risk factors for rebound deformity after growth modulation. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients undergoing growth modulation with a tension band plate for coronal plane deformity about the knee with subsequent implant removal. Exclusion criteria included completion epiphysiodesis or osteotomy at implant removal, ongoing growth modulation, and <1 year radiographic follow-up without rebound deformity. Mechanical lateral distal femoral angle, mechanical medial proximal tibial angle, hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), and mechanical axis station were measured before growth modulation, before implant removal, and at final follow-up. Results: In total, 67 limbs in 45 patients met the inclusion criteria. Mean age at growth modulation was 9.8 years (range, 3.4 to 15.4 y) and mean age at implant removal was 11.4 years (range, 5.3 to 16.4 y). Mean change in HKA after implant removal was 6.9 degrees (range, 0 to 23 degrees). In total, 52% of patients had >5 degrees rebound and 30% had >10 degrees rebound in HKA after implant removal. Females below 10 years and males below 12 years at time of growth modulation had greater mean change in HKA after implant removal compared with older patients (8.4 vs. 4.7 degrees, P=0.012). Patients with initial deformity >20 degrees had an increased frequency of rebound >10 degrees compared with patients with less severe initial deformity (78% vs. 22%, P=0.002). Conclusions: Rebound deformity after growth modulation is common. Growth modulation at a young age and large initial deformity increases risk of rebound. However, rebound does not occur in all at risk patients, therefore, we recommend against routine overcorrection. Level of Evidence: Level IV—retrospective study.

Growth-Friendly Spine Surgery in Escobar Syndrome Background: The aims of this study were to characterize the spinal deformity of patients with Escobar syndrome, describe results of growth-friendly treatments, and compare these results with those of an idiopathic early-onset scoliosis (EOS) cohort to determine whether the axial stiffness in Escobar syndrome limited correction. Methods: We used 2 multicenter databases to review the records of 8 patients with EOS associated with Escobar syndrome who had at least 2-year follow-up after initiation of growth-friendly treatment from 1990 to 2016. An idiopathic EOS cohort of 16 patients matched for age at surgery (±1 y), postoperative follow-up (±1 y), and initial curve magnitude (±10 degrees) was identified. A randomized 1:2 matching algorithm was applied (α=0.05). Results: In the Escobar group, spinal deformity involved 7 to 13 vertebrae and ranged from no vertebral anomalies in 3 patients to multiple segmentation defects in 6 patients. Mean age at first surgery was 5 years (range, 1.4 to 7.8 y) with a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (range, 4.0 to 10 y). Mean major curve improved from 76 degrees at initial presentation, to 43 degrees at first instrumentation, to 37 degrees at final follow-up (both P<0.001). Mean pelvic obliquity improved from 16 degrees (range, 5 to 31 degrees) preoperatively to 4 degrees (range, 0 to 8 degrees) at final follow-up (P=0.005). There were no differences in the mean percentage of major curve correction between the idiopathic EOS and Escobar groups at the immediate postoperative visit (P=0.743) or final follow-up (P=0.511). There were no differences between the cohorts in T1-S1 height at initial presentation (P=0.129) or in growth per month (P=0.211). Conclusions: Multiple congenital fusions and spinal curve deformity are common in Escobar syndrome. Despite large areas of congenital fusion, growth-friendly constructs facilitate spinal growth and improve curve correction. These results are comparable to those in idiopathic EOS. Level of Evidence: Level III—case-control study.

Common Elements in Surgical Site Infection Care Bundles for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis at North American Pediatric Institutions: A Survey of POSNA QSVI Challenge Participants Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) following posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis is a difficult complication, with little information published regarding the best preventative comprehensive care plan. The Spine Subgroup of the Quality, Safety, Value Initiative (QSVI) committee of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America undertook a survey to generate an overview of bundle elements in comprehensive SSI care bundles across institutions in North America. The purpose of this study was to develop a toolkit of SSI care bundle elements that could be used in developing future SSI care bundles. Methods: A survey email was sent to pediatric orthopaedic surgeons requesting a copy of the SSI prevention care bundle used in their practice. Surgeons were included if they had participated in the 2016 POSNA QSVI challenge, indicated they performed pediatric spine surgery, and had a spine SSI bundle. These bundles were evaluated by the QSVI committee and divided into preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative elements with the frequency of use of each element recorded. A follow-up qualitative questionnaire was sent assessing the implementation and development of these SSI bundles. Results: In total, 16 care bundles from 15 different institutions were included for review. The response rate for this survey was 44% of individuals (50/113 QSVI challenge participants) and 43% (15/35) of unique institutions. The most common elements included: use of preoperative antibiotics, use of preoperative chlorhexidine wipes, use of wound irrigation intraoperatively, and a standardized prescription for the length of postoperative antibiotic. Each of these elements was included in ≥75% of the SSI bundles evaluated. Conclusions: SSI care bundles are increasingly being used by pediatric institutions to lower the risk of SSI following pediatric spinal surgery. This study provides an overview of various care elements used in established SSI care bundles across multiple institutions in North America. It is hoped this data will provide institutions interested in developing their own SSI care bundle with useful information for beginning this process. Level of Evidence: Level V—Decision Analysis.

The Role of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures Background: Because of concerns about radiation exposure, some centers consider magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs) the preferred imaging modality for pediatric thoracic and/or lumbar compression fractures. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of computed tomography (CT) and MRI in diagnosing thoracolumbar compression fractures and the utility of MRI in their management. Methods: Retrospective review identified 52 patients aged 0 to 18 years with 191 thoracic and/or lumbar compression fractures who had both CT and MRI during the initial trauma evaluation. The decision to perform CT and/or MRI was made by the attending pediatric spine surgeon. In all cases the CT scan was performed before the MRI. All imaging studies were reviewed by a board-certified pediatric radiologist and attending pediatric spine surgeon. Results: Only 10 patients (19%) had a single-level injury. Of 42 with multiple compression fractures, 34 (81%) had fractures in contiguous levels, and 8 had noncontiguous injuries. Comparing CT and MRI, there was complete agreement in the number and distribution of fractures in 23 patients (44%). MRI identified additional levels of fracture in 15 patients (29%); 14 (27%) had fewer levels fractured on MRI than CT. Only one patient (2%) had fractures seen on MRI after a normal CT scan. Complete correlation between CT and MRI was seen in 59% (17/29) of patients aged 11 to 18 years, compared with 26% (6/23) of patients younger than 11. Conclusions: In pediatric patients with mild thoracic or lumbar compression fracture(s), CT scan demonstrates a high sensitivity in determining the presence or absence of a fracture compared with MRI. Although some variability exists between the 2 modalities in the exact number of spinal levels involved, the definitive treatment and outcome were not changed by the addition of MRI. The information that may be obtained from an MRI must be weighed against the increased time and expense of the study, as well as the risks associated with sedation when necessary. Level of Evidence: Level II—diagnostic study.

Alexandros Sfakianakis
Anapafseos 5 . Agios Nikolaos
Crete.Greece.72100
2841026182

6948891480

alsfakia@gmail.com